Start Researching Genealogy

Hidden Source: Frakturs

Do you have Pennsylvania German history in your family? Or German, Swiss, or French ancestors that immigrated to the east coast in the 18th and 19th century? You may be surprised to learn about early American frakturs (pronounced “frok-tours”), a type of folk art often overlooked by genealogists, that may contain important information about these people’s lives.

From The National Archives: Revolutionary War Frakturs collection on flickr, for Philip Frey of Pennsylvania, ca 1800 - ca 1900. Frakturs in this collection were generally used for bounty-land warrant applications or Revolutionary War pensions, to prove lineage. No known copyright restrictions.

Frakturs were illustrated manuscripts, created from mainly 1740 to 1860, with some as late as 1900. They were made with ink and watercolor, first by hand and later printed and hand-decorated or colored. They were often filled with motifs of angels, tulips and other flowers, hearts, stars, and birds (all of which are open to symbolic interpretation and linked to later prevalence within Dutch hex signs), as well as mythical creatures like mermaids and unicorns, and even a few historical figures like George Washington. 

The name “fraktur” comes from the latin fraktura, meaning a “breaking apart”, referring to the broken or fractured style of writing and similar style to the German typeface of the same name. This style of art was once called Frakturschriften, or “Fraktur Writings” (Library of Congress, Conner, and Roberts). The text was either in German or English, with a main entry in the center and often poems or quotes on the sides.

These frakturs were used to document important events and milestones in a person’s life, and can contain a wealth of genealogical information. For example, the Geburts and the Taufscheins, or the birth and baptism certificates, were often the only record of birth for an individual as they predated vital record keeping by local government. They contained names, family members, witnesses,  locations, dates, and the name and domination of the clergyman. Other types of frakturs include the Haus Segen, or house blessing, the vorschrift, or writing examples, and bucherzeichen, or bookplates.


”Certificate of birth : David Kraatz was born on the 12th day of August A.D. 1824 in Alsas Township, Berks County, Pa., 1824”. An example of a cut-paper Fraktur, from the collection Pennsylvania German broadsides and Fraktur, 1750-1979. Penn State University Libraries Digital Collection, Public Domain.

It should be noted that “the taufschein and the vorschrift form the vast bulk of fraktur documentation. Wedding and death certificates are relatively rare.” (Library of Congress, Conner, and Roberts). For those interested in researching your ancestors, definitely start with the birth and baptism certificates by browsing online collections, which we’ve linked for you further down this post.

Frakturs were brought to the southeast Pennsylvania area by German-speaking immigrants, hailing from the Rhineland area of Europe and nearby Switzerland. Most belonged to the Lutheran and Reformed churches, but also Anabaptist (Amish, Mennonite, etc.) and others. Frakturs have also been found in other places the Pennsylvania Dutch migrated, including Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, North Carolina, New Jersey, and parts of Canada.

Fraktur of John Hoagland of New Jersey and family, from the National Archives: Revolutionary War Fracturs collection on flickr. Frakturs in this collection were generally used for bounty-land warrant applications or Revolutionary War pensions, to prove lineage. No known copyright restrictions.

Though a form of frakturs existed in their homelands (or predecessors like the Patenbrief and the Goettelbrief), the type of art and tradition that developed in colonial America is unique to the new culture.

They were usually produced by ministers and school teachers, for those they came into contact with in their daily lives, or for their family and friends. The work was done as a side gig to their main profession. Later they would design and print blank forms to be hand colored with text entered by the families, though some communities had earlier access to printing presses than others. 

An example of a birth certificate and baptismal fraktur. Caption reads: “Geburts- und Tauf- schein for Susanna Walder, 1825 Sept. 20-1825 Nov. 6” from Penn State University Libraries Digital Collection. More genealogy information in the description on their website. Public domain.

While the vorschrift, or writing samples, would be proudly displayed in schools and at home, the other types of more decorative fraktur were not made for hanging on the walls for all to see. In a religious culture where “public art, art for display, was forbidden”, these documents were personal and private treasures. They stored them hidden away “in Bibles or other large books, pasted onto the inside lids of blanket chests, or rolled up in bureau drawers” (Library of Congress et al). It was not uncommon for taufschein to be buried with an individual. 

Today most belong to museums and university collections, prized by collectors and sold at auctions for thousands of dollars. Handmade frakturs seem to be worth more than printed versions, as do aesthetically pleasing and unique designs, and those in good condition. Be wary of fakes and aware of modern reproductions, and always get any finds properly appraised.   

Luckily for those of us interested in the information these works of art contain, many of these collections can be browsed online and used for research remotely. 

Notice the similarities between the earlier birth certificate of Susanna Walder above, from 1825, and this one from 1844. Same motiffs of angels and birds, though this one includes a seal of the United States in the top middle, perhaps indicative of newfound patriotism. From Penn State University Libraries Digital Collection, title reads: “Geburts- und Tauf-Schein for Emeleine Sara Anna Hix, 1844 Nov. 2-1844 Dec. 25”. Public domain.


Source List & Additional Online Reading:

“Diese Sing-Noten-Buchlein gehoret Catarina Weillerin, 1788” from Penn State University Libraries Digital Collections. A beautiful example of a manuscript songbook fraktur, belonging to a Catarina Weillerin of Chester County, Pennsylvania, from 1788. Public domain.

Offline Suggested Reading:

Earnest, Corrine P., Rusell D. Earnest. The Heart of the Taufschein: fraktur and pivotal role of Berks County, Pennsylvania, Kutztown, PA, Pennsylvania German Society, 2012.

Shelley, Donald A. The Fraktur-Writings or Illuminated Manuscripts of the Pennsylvania Germans, Pennsylvania German Folklore Society, 1961.

Stopp, Klaus. The Printed Birth and Baptismal Certificates of the German Americans. Mainz, Germany; East Berlin, PA: K. Stopp, 1997.


The Best Historical Photo Collections on Flickr

Though you probably won’t uncover photos of your ancestors in these collections, you can gain great context about the way they may have lived, the events they lived through, and the locations they called home.

When a user, like The Library of Congress, uploads their photos to flickr they all show up in their Photostream. The user can optionally group these photos into Albums, and further group these albums into Collections. While the latter two are easier to browse, be aware that not every flickr user utilizes these features - and also there may be more photos in the photostream that are not in any albums.

You do not need a flickr account to browse these free photo collections. Be aware of photo rights, however, and do not distribute any photos without checking their license first. Ready to explore? Here’s my list of historical photo collections found on flickr!

“Itinerant photographer in Columbus, Ohio”. Flickr: The Library of Congress. No known restrictions.

Dance at the J.W.B. Servicemen’s Center, Waukegan, Illinois, 1919. Flickr: Center for Jewish History; No known copyright restrictions.

“NACA Employees Looking Sharp for a Staff Photo at Ames” Flickr: NASA on The Commons; No known copyright restrictions.

“Florida State Normal and Industrial School class of 1904 portrait: Tallahassee, Florida”. State Library and Archives of Florida. Flickr: Florida Memory. No known copyright restrictions.

“Group of men and women at shore”. Flickr: California Historical Society. No known copyright restrictions.

“Game of Marbles, 1919” Flickr: UA Archives / Upper Arlington History. No known copyright restrictions.

Derry, NH Winter Carnival Queen 1920s, flickr: Derry Public Library, Some Rights Reserved.

Miami University women’s basketball team, 1911. flickr: Miami University Libraries Digital Collections

“Tea with friends, and one must wear one’s finest hat!” Flickr: Photos of the Past. No known copyright restrictions.

“Great-uncle Leon Griffin, about 1920” Flickr: Jim Griffin. Found in the group Dated Vintage Photographs (pre 1945). Public Domain.

“Barfields”. Flickr: Valerie Some Rights Reserved.

Upcoming Virtual Genealogy Conferences

January 6, 2021

Image: RootsTech.org. RootsTech Connect will look different this year!

Image: RootsTech.org. RootsTech Connect will look different this year!

Mark your calendars for these recommended 2021 (mostly virtual) genealogy conferences:


  • RootsTech Connect - 25 - 27 February, Free with Registration, rootstech.org


  • New England Regional Genealogical Consortium Conference / NERGC, “Springing From the Past Into the Future”, 1 April - 31 May, Registration with Fees, nergc.org


  • Ohio Genealogical Society Conference / OGS Conference, “Bringin’ It Home 2021”, 14 - 17 April, Registration with Fees, ogsconference.org


  • National Genealogical Society Family History Conference / NGS Family History Conference, 19-22 May, “Deep Roots of a Nation”, Registration with Fees, conference.ngsgenealogy.org

    *Note: This conference has not yet announced plans to go virtual, and plans to be held in Richmond, Virginia*


  • Southern California Genealogical Society / SCGS Online Conferences: Genetic Genealogy, 4 - 5 June, and jamboree 2021, 11 - 12 June, Free, scgsgenealogy.com


  • International German Genealogy Partnership Conference / IGGP Virtual Conference, “Researching Together Worldwide / Weltweit Gemeinsam Forschen”, 17 - 24 July, Registration with Fees, iggpartner.org


  • Institute of Genealogy & Historical Research / IGHR 2021, 25 - 30 July, Registration with Fees, ighr.gagensociety.org


Other interesting online events coming up:


Also see:


Using Facial Recognition to Compare Photos and Identify Individuals

December 20, 2020

By now, you’re probably aware of the facial recognition built in to many photo storage programs. When you upload a new photo, a program like Google will automatically try to identify who is in the photo, based on labels you have previously created from other photos you have stored. Every now and then you will have to correct a label or two, but I find it to be highly accurate.

It may not have occurred to you that you can use these programs to identify individuals in your stack of old ancestor photos - if you have at least one other photo to compare with, that is confirmed to be the individual in question.

How many of us have old photos we know must be ONE of our ancestors, but we can’t figure out who? I see many posts across various Facebook genealogy groups, asking if two different pictures could be the same person, so I know I’m not alone in this!

Programs that currently have facial recognition for public use:

After uploading to Google Photos, you may have to wait a bit for the facial recognition to kick in (up to 24 hours) and be sure that the feature for “face grouping” is turned on in your settings. You will see the results grouped in a “People” album, without names unless they match someone already given a name in your photos. The accuracy is pretty good, but not 100%.

There are also online reverse image searches, in which you upload a photo or a link to a photo, and search for similar images online. Some, like Google Images, are not based on facial recognition but on similarities within whole images. Others, like PimEyes, actually use facial recognition technology - but it might cost you.

In addition to these programs, there are many additional programs, some free with registration, that offer facial comparison between photos, that I have not had the opportunity to try yet - except for the demos that is. And I love the demos!

Above: A screen capture of the Face++ demo which I used to compare a young soldier and an older gentleman. I knew the soldier was one of a few brothers, but not sure which. Using facial recognition I was able to get a “probability high” result on one of them. For further details, you can click the second tab “Response JSON” while using the demo to see the code. I am able to learn the confidence level is 71.6% positive.

With privacy concerns in mind, I’m still crossing my fingers for some more robust genealogy tools in the near future. How amazing would it be to instantly identify all of our old photos - or find a wealth of new-to-us photos of our ancestors??

Have you had success using these programs to identify old photos? Or know of any other similar tools? We would love to hear from you in the comments.

When Abstracts are Wrong

Dec 1, 2020

My awesome cousin brought this example to me, and it’s a great one to show how abstracts can have misinformation. With abstracts, information is extracted and summarized (usually by a computer algorithm). You may see them on database sites like FamilySearch.org or Ancestry.com when you click on a promising record like a census. The abstract will show you the names of the head of house and their family members, ages, occupations, and so on.

This is similar to transcriptions in which information is copied, usually by hand, to the best representation possible. Both abstracts and transcriptions allow room for errors and should not be given as much weight as the original source (see Types of Sources).

An abstract of an 1861 Census of Canada courtesy of Ancestry.com

An abstract of an 1861 Census of Canada courtesy of Ancestry.com

A first glance at the abstract looks like our subject, Judith Cook (misspelled in the census as “Judath”) is Native American. Let’s open the census and examine closer.

Above: selection from the 1861 Census of Canada, New Brunswick, Westmorland, courtesy of Ancestry.com, with “native” circled in red.

Above: selection from the 1861 Census of Canada, New Brunswick, Westmorland, courtesy of Ancestry.com, with “native” circled in red.

The census shows Judath Cook (or rather “do” as short for “ditto” meaning the same as above, which is “Cook” in this scenario) below her husband, Samuel Cook. The header is out of sight in this selection, but the column to the right reads “Race and where born”. Here it says “Nova Scotia” for Samuel Cook, and “native” for his wife.

We can assume that one of Ancestry.com’s algorithms picked up “native” in a column for race and calculated her ethnicity to be Native American in the abstract. However, if the answer for her husband is related to the place (Nova Scotia), it’s more likely that in this case, native means native to the area, as in born in New Brunswick.

We can confirm this by looking up information about the 1861 Census of Canada. On the Library and Archives Canada page for this census we find the following disclaimer: “In the 1861 census of New Brunswick, “Native” meant born in that province, not Aboriginal.”

We can now come to the logical conclusion that the abstract is incorrect, Judith Cook’s race is undetermined from this census, and that she is native to New Brunswick.

Other sources may show her race, and we may come to discover later that she is Native American, but this specific source does not show this.

Long story short, be careful with abstracts!



Sources: